AI

Motus2 Screws in a Bulb, Then Grades Its Own Future

Robb Harlan 5 min read

A world model that only dreams the next frame is a screensaver. Motus2 tries to close the loop: propose an action, imagine the video, score whether the task moved forward, then update the policy. Yihang Luo, ShengShu Technology’s co-founder and CEO, unveiled it on 10 September at the Inclusion Conference on the Bund. The company posted a press release on 14 September.

The research team sits at ShengShu’s GensPI lab and Tsinghua. Hardware partners named on the project page are WuJi, Sharpa, and Tianji.

Beige dual-arm robot wearing a cap and Wuji Hand 2 gloves at a white table
Wuji Hand 2 on a Tianji Gento Luna torso. Source: Motus2 project page.

One backbone, three jobs

Motus2 is a shared-parameter video-action model with three interfaces:

  • a policy that emits action chunks
  • a simulator that predicts the visual future of those chunks
  • an evaluator that scores predicted progress

At test time, Best-of-N planning samples several chunks, ranks them, and executes the winner. After each chunk the robot takes a real observation and plans again. During post-training, model-based RL (DiffusionNFT in the paper) uses the same value signal to shift the policy. Prediction and evaluation weights stay frozen; only action-related parameters move.

Data is a pyramid: about 130,000 hours of raw egocentric recordings, from monocular web video up to synchronized stereo, then more than 100 hours of robot trajectories plus human-robot alignment. Under the same target-task fine-tuning, human-only pretraining averages 51% on five primary real-robot tasks. Adding robot-domain mid-training raises that to 84%.

Those five tasks, 20 trials each, are placing a ball, multi-finger manipulation, attaching an eraser, screwing in a light bulb, and placing a phone.

A separate study on phone placement and multi-finger work puts the base policy at 65%. Planning alone reaches 67.5%. MBRL alone reaches 72.5%. Both together hit 75%.

A lightweight tactile expert refines each short sub-chunk from the latest contact window. On pulling a paper cup and tearing paper, adding it lifts average success from 60% to 72.5% (cup 65→75, paper 55→70).

Headless dual-arm torso in a green jacket with black Wuji hands over a pan of toast
Wuji hands on Tianji Marvin arms during kitchen-style data collection. Source: Motus2 project page.

The bodies

The project page shows three bimanual setups used for collection and post-training: Wuji hands on Tianji Marvin arms, Wuji Hand 2 on Tianji Gento Luna, and Sharpa Wave hands on the same Luna torso. Alignment capture uses Wuji Human Gloves without commanding a robot.

Released demos include screwing a bulb, tearing paper with both hands, turning pages, opening a can, and finding a hidden object.

Same Luna torso with silver Sharpa Wave dexterous hands on a table
Sharpa Wave hands on Tianji Gento Luna. Source: Motus2 project page.

ShengShu frames Motus2 as L3 (“acting in the world”) on its five-level general-world-model roadmap, with a look toward L4 autonomous agents. The press release is clear that long-horizon open-world learning is still future work. The arXiv paper is 2608.30237, revised 10 September.

A Human’s Take

Screwing in a bulb at 84% after you add robot hours is the number I care about, not the 130,000-hour pyramid. Human video buys you priors; the mid-training is what makes the hands stop missing the socket. Best-of-N planning plus a frozen evaluator is a grown-up way to spend extra inference, as long as nobody confuses “self-evolving” with a robot that trains itself on your kitchen overnight. Watch whether those 20-trial task sets survive a second lab with a different Sharpa or Wuji unit.

Sources